Issues and Cases

Feature ImageConstitutional rights are capped by city’s “inclusionary” cap on home prices

California Building Industry Association v. City of San Jose


Contact: Anthony L. Francois

Status: The California Supreme Court granted the petition for review on September 11, 2013. Briefing on the merits was completed Feb. 20, 2014. Oral argument was held on April 8, 2015. Decision issued June 15, 2015. The U.S. Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari on February 29, 2016.

PLF PodcastSummary
:

The City of San Jose’s inclusionary zoning ordinance, applying to residential developments of at least 20 homes, requires that 15 percent of the homes be sold at below-market prices determined by the City to buyers with qualifying income levels, or the payment of a $122,000 in-lieu fee.

The California Court of Appeal, Sixth District, held in this case that San Jose’s inclusionary zoning ordinance is an exercise of it police power, and not a development exaction subject to heightened scrutiny.

On appeal to the California Supreme Court, PLF argues that inclusionary zoning mandates are exactions, subjected to heightened scrutiny under the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on uncompensated takings, and that under that standard the City’s ordinance is facially unconstitutional.

 

PLF Testimonial

"Most people wouldn't stick it out, and since PLF is litigating for principle, we have to thank PLF for doing what they do."
Trevor Burrus, Research Fellow at CATO Institute

Connect with Us       Donate to PLF


PLF Client Highlight

"PLF allowed me to keep operating my business, even in the midst of a crisis. My business means the world to me and my family - PLF saved it for us. Thank you."
R.J. Bruner, Wildcat Moving Co.

Connect with Us       Donate to PLF


PLF Client Highlight

"A 20 year battle is over, thanks to Pacific Legal Foundation.  My father would be proud. Thank you PLF for your support."
Coy Jr. and Linda Koontz

Connect with Us       Donate to PLF


What Your Support Means

Donate to PLF

 

A PLF Victory for Freedom

Supreme Court Victories


PLF Donor Highlight

"For PLF, it's not a job - it's a passion. You can feel very good about how well your money is used in support of the programs they have."
Dr. Robert S. Pepper

Our History       Join The Fight

PLF Testimonial

"Individuals for whom a major case is a one shot deal are far more aggrieved. Most individuals cannot afford to do anything with that grievance, and that's where organizations like PLF come in."

Professor Steven Eagle, George Mason School of Law

Our History       Join The Fight

63%
of PLF donations come from individuals

 

Search our case database
Search the case database for access to hundreds of open and closed cases.