Issues and Cases

Race- and sex-based commission selection violates Proposition 209

Connerly v. State of California


Contact: Meriem L. Hubbard

Status:  Common Cause and League's Motion to Intervene was filed on August 5, 2015. Hearing is scheduled for October 30, 2015.
 
Summary:
The California Citizens Redistricting Commission is tasked with drawing California’s Congressional, Assembly, Senate, and Board of Equalization Electoral Districts. The 14 Commissioners are chosen pursuant to Government Code § 8252. Under Section 8252, the first eight Commission members are appointed by random selection from a pool of qualified applicants. These eight appointees in turn select the final six Commission members pursuant to the mandates of Section 8252(g). Section 8252(g) requires that race, ethnicity, and sex be considered in the selection process in violation of Article I, Section 31 of the California Constitution (Proposition 209), which prohibits the use of race, ethnicity, and sex in public education, public employment, and public contracting.

Representing Ward Connerly, and American Civil Rights Foundation, PLF attorneys are bringing a facial challenge to Section 8252(g)’s requirements regarding the use of race, ethnicity, and sex in selecting commission members.

 

PLF Testimonial

"Most people wouldn't stick it out, and since PLF is litigating for principle, we have to thank PLF for doing what they do."
Trevor Burrus, Research Fellow at CATO Institute

Connect with Us       Donate to PLF


PLF Client Highlight

"PLF allowed me to keep operating my business, even in the midst of a crisis. My business means the world to me and my family - PLF saved it for us. Thank you."
R.J. Bruner, Wildcat Moving Co.

Connect with Us       Donate to PLF


PLF Client Highlight

"A 20 year battle is over, thanks to Pacific Legal Foundation.  My father would be proud. Thank you PLF for your support."
Coy Jr. and Linda Koontz

Connect with Us       Donate to PLF


What Your Support Means

Donate to PLF

 

A PLF Victory for Freedom

Supreme Court Victories


PLF Donor Highlight

"For PLF, it's not a job - it's a passion. You can feel very good about how well your money is used in support of the programs they have."
Dr. Robert S. Pepper

Our History       Join The Fight

PLF Testimonial

"Individuals for whom a major case is a one shot deal are far more aggrieved. Most individuals cannot afford to do anything with that grievance, and that's where organizations like PLF come in."

Professor Steven Eagle, George Mason School of Law

Our History       Join The Fight