Personal care providers can’t be conscripted into union representation

Harris v. Quinn


Contact: Deborah J. La Fetra

Status: Victory! Supreme Court issued judgement on June 30, 2014 and struck down an Illinois executive order and law that declares all personal home healthcare assistants to be public employees.



Summary:
May a state compel personal care providers to accept and financially support a union as their exclusive representative to petition the state for greater reimbursements from its Medicaid programs?

As amicus (along with the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence), in support of  Pamela Harris, et al.  PLF argues:  No.  Compelling personal care providers to be deemed public employees for the purpose of being represented by a union violates the First Amendment guarantee that Americans cannot be compelled to speak or associate, or petition the government, against their wishes.

The facts giving rise to this issue are as follows:  An Illinois executive order and law declare all personal home assistants to be public employees, for the sole purpose of being represented by a collective bargaining unit that seeks to lobby for greater government spending on home health care.  The assistants were deemed to be represented by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), so that they would have “an effective voice” in petitioning the government for more public spending on home-based medical care.  Several personal home attendants, including Pamela Harris, sued (represented by the National Right to Work Foundation).  However, the district court and the Seventh Circuit upheld the order and law.  The attendants are asking the Supreme Court to review the case.

 

PLF Client Highlight

"We worked very hard for our home and for our retirement dreams - the city is trying to take it all away from us. We really appreciate PLF for giving us a voice and taking our case. The time has come, we need to fight back."
Daniel & Maria Levin

Connect with Us       Donate to PLF


PLF Client Highlight

"PLF allowed me to keep operating my business, even in the midst of a crisis. My business means the world to me and my family - PLF saved it for us. Thank you."
R.J. Bruner, Wildcat Moving Co.

Connect with Us       Donate to PLF


PLF Client Highlight

"A 20 year battle is over, thanks to Pacific Legal Foundation.  My father would be proud. Thank you PLF for your support."
Coy Jr. and Linda Koontz

Connect with Us       Donate to PLF


What Your Support Means

Donate to PLF

 

A PLF Victory for Freedom

Supreme Court Victories


PLF Donor Highlight

"For PLF, it's not a job - it's a passion. You can feel very good about how well your money is used in support of the programs they have."
Dr. Robert S. Pepper

Our History       Join The Fight


PLF Donor Highlight

We contribute to a number of “think tanks” whose mission is to protect our freedom and liberty and defend the Constitution. We feel our best return on investment is from PLF which we classify as a “do tank” because of its clearly quantifiable success in accomplishing that mission.

David & Annette Jorgensen

Our History       Join The Fight