Contact: Deborah J. La Fetra
Summary: May a state compel personal care providers to accept and financially support a union as their exclusive representative to petition the state for greater reimbursements from its Medicaid programs?As amicus (along with the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence), in support of Pamela Harris, et al. PLF argues: No. Compelling personal care providers to be deemed public employees for the purpose of being represented by a union violates the First Amendment guarantee that Americans cannot be compelled to speak or associate, or petition the government, against their wishes.The facts giving rise to this issue are as follows: An Illinois executive order and law declare all personal home assistants to be public employees, for the sole purpose of being represented by a collective bargaining unit that seeks to lobby for greater government spending on home health care. The assistants were deemed to be represented by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), so that they would have “an effective voice” in petitioning the government for more public spending on home-based medical care. Several personal home attendants, including Pamela Harris, sued (represented by the National Right to Work Foundation). However, the district court and the Seventh Circuit upheld the order and law. The attendants are asking the Supreme Court to review the case.
"A 20 year battle is over, thanks to Pacific Legal Foundation. My father would be proud. Thank you PLF for your support." Coy Jr. and Linda Koontz
Connect with Us Donate to PLF
Donate to PLF
Supreme Court Victories
"For PLF, it's not a job - it's a passion. You can feel very good about how well your money is used in support of the programs they have." Dr. Robert S. Pepper
Our History Join The Fight
Search the case database for access to hundreds of open and closed cases.
National Litigation Center 930 G Street | Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 419-7111 (phone) | (916) 419-7747(fax) © 2014 Pacific Legal Foundation