Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

PLF and the Sacketts: an important win at the Supreme Court

Contact: Damien M. Schiff

Status: On remand:  The Sacketts’ motion to strike portions of EPA’s administrative record is fully briefed and awaiting decision by the district court. Plaintiffs filed a motion to supplement complaint on Mar. 26, 2014.

Summary:

Case Info & Media

January 9, 2012 Oral Argument
Audio
Transcript

In an unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court rules that landowners have a right to direct, meaningful judicial review if the EPA effectively seizes control of their property by declaring it to be "wetlands." The Court rules in favor of PLF clients Mike and Chantell Sackett, of Priest Lake, Idaho, who were told by EPA -- and by the Ninth Circuit -- that they could not get direct court review of EPA's claim that their two-thirds of an acre parcel is "wetlands" and that they must obey a detailed and intrusive EPA "compliance" order, or be hit with fines of up to $75,000 per day.

Case Talking Points:

On March 21, with a 9-0 vote, the United State Supreme Court ruled that landowners have a right to direct, meaningful judicial review if the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency effectively seizes control of their property by declaring it to be “wetlands.”

Mike and Chantell are renting a house, but wanted to build a home of their own. Six years ago they bought a 0.63-acre parcel for $23,000.

The Sacketts' parcel is 500 feet west of Priest Lake, separated from the lake by a house and a road.

EPA issued a "compliance" order, demanding that the Sacketts stop construction, remove the gravel and return the land to EPA's liking. Moving the gravel would cost $27,000 — more than what the Sacketts paid for the land.

Read more facts about this case

 

Case Press:

"The EPA used bullying and threats of terrifying fines, and has made our life hell for the past five years. Now the Supreme Court has come to our rescue."
-- Mike Sackett,
LA Times

"EPA is not above the law. That's the bottom line with today's ruling."
-- PLF Principal Attorney Damien Schiff,
CNN

"There is no reason to think that the Clean Water Act was uniquely designed to enable the strong-arming of regulated parties into ‘voluntary compliance’ without the opportunity for judicial review."
-- Justice Antonin Scalia,
New York Times

"Real relief requires Congress to do what it should have done in the first place: provide a reasonably clear rule regarding the reach of the Clean Water Act." -- Justice Samuel A. Alito,  Jr.,
New York Times

 "As this nightmare went on, we rubbed our eyes and started to wonder if we were living in some totalitarian country."
-- Mike Sackett,
The Christian Science Monitor

"Bullying – that’s what the EPA does. They came into our lives, took our property, put us in limbo, told us we can’t do anything with it, and then threatened us with fines."
-- Chantell Sackett,
The Washington Times

"Federal agencies are out of control. The grant of virtually unlimited power with no accountability has gone to the heads of some unelected bureaucrats, and nowhere is that more true than at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)."
-- The Washington Times

 

PLF Client Highlight

"We worked very hard for our home and for our retirement dreams - the city is trying to take it all away from us. We really appreciate PLF for giving us a voice and taking our case. The time has come, we need to fight back."
Daniel & Maria Levin

Connect with Us       Donate to PLF


PLF Client Highlight

"PLF allowed me to keep operating my business, even in the midst of a crisis. My business means the world to me and my family - PLF saved it for us. Thank you."
R.J. Bruner, Wildcat Moving Co.

Connect with Us       Donate to PLF


PLF Client Highlight

"A 20 year battle is over, thanks to Pacific Legal Foundation.  My father would be proud. Thank you PLF for your support."
Coy Jr. and Linda Koontz

Connect with Us       Donate to PLF


What Your Support Means

Donate to PLF

 

A PLF Victory for Freedom

Supreme Court Victories


PLF Donor Highlight

"For PLF, it's not a job - it's a passion. You can feel very good about how well your money is used in support of the programs they have."
Dr. Robert S. Pepper

Our History       Join The Fight


PLF Donor Highlight

We contribute to a number of “think tanks” whose mission is to protect our freedom and liberty and defend the Constitution. We feel our best return on investment is from PLF which we classify as a “do tank” because of its clearly quantifiable success in accomplishing that mission.

David & Annette Jorgensen

Our History       Join The Fight